When international stock returns lag, investors may feel tempted to double down on their home market. Historical data suggests the long-term benefits of diversifying globally.
With U.S. stocks outperforming non-U.S. stocks in recent years, some investors have again turned their attention towards the role that global diversification plays in their portfolios.
For the five-year period ending October 31, 2018, the S&P 500 Index had an annualized return of 11.34 percent while the MSCI World ex USA Index returned 1.86 percent, and the MSCI Emerging Markets Index returned 0.78 percent. As U.S. stocks have outperformed international and emerging markets stocks over the last several years, some investors might be reconsidering the benefits of investing outside the U.S.
While there are many reasons why a U.S.-based investor may prefer a degree of home bias in their equity allocation, using return differences over a relatively short period as the sole input into this decision may result in missing opportunities that the global markets offer. While international and emerging markets stocks have delivered disappointing returns relative to the U.S. over the last few years, it is important to remember that:
- Non-U.S. stocks help provide valuable diversification benefits.
- Recent performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
There’s a World of Opportunity in Equities
The global equity market is large and represents a world of investment opportunities. As shown in Exhibit 1, nearly half of the investment opportunities in global equity markets lie outside the U.S.1 Non-U.S. stocks, including developed and emerging markets, account for 48 percent of world market capitalization2 and represent thousands of companies in countries all over the world. A portfolio investing solely within the U.S. would not be exposed to the performance of those markets.
Exhibit 1: World Equity Market Capitalization
The Lost Decade
We can examine the potential opportunity cost associated with failing to diversify globally by reflecting on the period in global markets from 2000-2009. During this period, often called the “lost decade” by U.S. investors, the S&P 500 Index recorded its worst ever 10-year performance with a total cumulative return of -9.1 percent. However, looking beyond U.S. large-cap equities, conditions were more favorable for global equity investors as most equity asset classes outside the U.S. generated positive returns over the course of the decade (See Exhibit 2).3
Exhibit 2: Global Index Returns, January 2000-December 2009
Expanding beyond this period and looking at performance for each of the 11 decades starting in 1900 and ending in 2010, the U.S. market outperformed the world market in five decades and underperformed in the other six.4 This further reinforces why an investor pursuing the equity premium should consider a global allocation. By holding a globally diversified portfolio, investors are positioned to capture returns wherever they occur.
Pick a Country?
Are there systematic ways to identify which countries will outperform others in advance? Exhibit 3 illustrates the randomness in country equity market rankings (from highest to lowest) for 22 different developed market countries over the past 20 years.5 This graphic conveys how difficult it would be to execute a strategy that relies on picking the best country and the resulting importance of diversification.
Exhibit 3: Equity Returns of Developed Markets
In addition, concentrating a portfolio in any one country can expose investors to large variations in returns. The difference between the best- and worst‑performing countries can be significant. For example, since 1998, the average return of the best‑performing developed market country was approximately 44 percent, while the average return of the worst-performing country was approximately -16 percent. Diversification means an investor’s portfolio is unlikely to be the best or worst performing relative to any individual country, but diversification also provides a means to achieve a more consistent outcome and more importantly helps reduce and manage catastrophic losses that can be associated with investing in just a small number of stocks or a single country.
A Diversified Approach
Over long periods of time, investors may benefit from consistent exposure in their portfolios to both U.S. and non‑U.S. equities. While both asset classes offer the potential to earn positive expected returns in the long run, they may perform quite differently over short periods. While the performance of different countries and asset classes will vary over time, there is no reliable evidence that this performance can be predicted in advance. An approach to equity investing that uses the global opportunity set available to investors can provide diversification benefits as well as potentially higher expected returns.
This article was originally published by Dimensional Fund Advisors.
1 – As of December 31, 2017. Data provided by Bloomberg. Market cap data is free-float adjusted and meets minimum liquidity and listing requirements. China market capitalization excludes A-shares, which are generally only available to mainland China investors. For educational purposes; should not be used as investment advice.
2 – The total market value of a company’s outstanding shares, computed as price times shares outstanding.
3 – S&P data © 2018 S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, a division of S&P Global. All rights reserved. MSCI data © MSCI 2018, all rights reserved. Indices are not available for direct investment. Index performance does not reflect expenses associated with the management of an actual portfolio. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.
4 – Source: Annual country index return data from the Dimson-Marsh-Staunton (DMS) Global Returns Data, provided by Morningstar, Inc.
5- Source: MSCI country indices (net dividends) for each country listed. Does not include Israel, which MSCI classified as an emerging market prior to May 2010. MSCI data © MSCI 2018, all rights reserved. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Indices are not available for direct investment; therefore, their performance does not reflect the expenses associated with the management of an actual portfolio.
Read more from our blog: